How h4831sc load data can Save You Time, Stress, and Money.

How h4831sc load data can Save You Time, Stress, and Money.

Blog Article

Nevertheless IMR 4831 and H4831SC are diverse powders, you will discover that in lots of instances, where one of these is mentioned the other is going to be likewise. Also, you'll find there is a fairly constant connection amongst them with reference to shown loads.

I've made use of H4831 (and H4831SC), And that i use it. There are not lots of cartridges which i utilize it for as I appear to be generally to gravitate to other powders. Nonetheless, I can't say that it isn't going to function. It is simply that Various other powders operate greater for your specified cartridge. For example, in the 280, H4831 gave me superior velocity and really fantastic teams with Nosler 140 AB. However, RL19 was marginally improved in accuracy, even though the velocity was virtually similar.

It truly is probably that no more discussion is needed, by which scenario we advise beginning a brand new thread. If nonetheless you are feeling your response is necessary you are able to even now do so.

I've had a number of rifles that fouled truly poor. Acquiring each of the copper out was a real PIA till I found Wipe-Out foaming bore cleaner.

Anyway, I knew The 2 lbs . of H4831SC used exactly the same data, but I did not know no matter if there was just about anything different between a pound of powder labeled "Extreme" and 1 not so labeled. A contact to Hodgdon verified which they ended up the truth is similar and the sole distinction was The brand over the label.

Did you ever try out H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I've a 300wsm now. Taking pictures 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with conventional chamber. Questioning What to anticipate with 215 bergers with H4331sc?

I don't like to work up a load making use of one particular wide range of powder and then have to work up again for the reason that I operate out and possess to get started on employing a new lot quantity.

excaliber said: I have found the exact opposite to generally be true in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and equally precise powder in my 300 Acquire Mag.

WA I'd personally advise a slower burner that will give far better situation density like H1000 or IMR 7977, particularly if you are loading heavies prolonged.

locutus claimed: I even now have a superb stockpile of H450, the ball powder equivalent of 4831, which flows via my powder steps efficiently.

I have experienced equivalent knowledge with H4350. For me, some ball powders is not going to h4831sc load data shoot properly with nearly anything other than Fed215's. Some elements just Do not play well with other. Seems like you have picked 3 superior powders, I might assume at the very least one of them to shoot.

I take advantage of 52 grs H4831sc which has a 117gr Hornady BTSP. It truly is exact, moderate mannered, and knocks whitetails h4831sc load data down DRT. If it was me, I'd personally commence at fifty two gr and work up.

I usually often receive the sc Model. Utilizing a powder measure it hangs up a lot less as a consequence of shorter kernels and I think allows much more steady metering so considerably less time you take trickling in the final bit of charge to make excess weight. So basically the SC will save you occasions

This looks as if a superb destination to divulge somewhat more facts on Hodgdon, H4831 especially...I at the time had a h4831 vs h4831sc pound of H4831SC sit to the shelf for a variety of many years. It had been ordered prior to Hodgdon started publicizing the "Serious" line of powders, of which the H4831s are an element.